Service and Delivery
Knowledge Element: Commissionning Procedure
Definition of Knowledge Element:
Know the standard commissioning procedure and how this should be applied to unique system installations. Also know how to make improvements to the procedure.
A very brief summary of the Knowledge:
The commissioning procedure begins with a full power off safety check. This includes ensuring all mains electrical power is properly connected and earth continuity and insulation readings comply with regulations. A full polarity check of low voltage DC equipment should be carried out. An inspection of all mechanical assemblies, safety covers and access panels should be carried out. Mains power should be applied in stages where appropriate, Testing each circuit independently when possible. Full system checking can then begin.
A summary of expert opinion:
The knowledge named 'Commissionning Procedure' is considered to be very important.
In addition, the knowledge is thought to be quite difficult to replace, it is mostly learned by study, and Between 30% and 60% of Group are Experts.
It is also specialised knowledge, and quite stable knowledge.
See Parameter table below for more detail.
Risk:
This knowledge element has a risk value of 5.47, whilst the average risk for the whole knowledge structure is 4.862. Consult the RISK page for more details.
Knowledge linked by learning dependency:
| Commissioning a System |
| Commissionning Procedure |
|---|
Postrequisite knowledge implies that Commissionning Procedure must be understood before for a person can gain a full understanding of the knowledge listed in the top row of the Linked Knowledge table.
Commissionning Procedure has no prerequisite knowledge items and is therefore known as a leaf node. A leaf node is knowledge that has not been investigated further when the map was constructed.
Parameters assigned for Commissionning Procedure.
| Identifier | Name | Value | Clarifier | Weight | Study Mean |
P1 |
Importance |
7.0 |
very important |
1.0 |
6.34 |
P2 |
Recovery |
4.0 |
quite difficult to replace |
1.0 |
3.38 |
P3 |
Study-Exp |
2.0 |
mostly learned by study |
1.0 |
3.46 |
P4 |
Known By |
4.0 |
Between 30% and 60% of Group are Experts |
-1.0 |
2.80 |
P6 |
Specialised |
8.0 |
specialised knowledge |
1.0 |
5.05 |
P7 |
Stability |
4.0 |
quite stable knowledge |
-0.7 |
6.41 |
People Involved with Commissionning Procedure:
| Person | Expert | Capable | Responsible | M A Smith | --- |
Yes |
--- |
A A Pendragon | Yes |
--- |
--- |
|---|
Computed Similarity
The most similar nodes to Commissionning Procedure are Common Faults solutions and Service levels and System testing.
The most dissimilar node to Commissionning Procedure is Journey planning.
Computer generated Options for Action:
Options for Action are computer generated ideas for the development of a particular knowledge area that an analyst or manager may wish to consider. The options generated for Commissionning Procedure are listed below.
Option Class is :- Preserving Knowledge
This option is :- The formal learning, documentation and integration of lessons during and on completion of work
This briefly involves :- Conduct a session to carry out a formal review of issues concerning the knowledge in question. The knowledge may be applied in several projects and lessons may be learned from any of them so the people invited to the review may have diverse backgrounds. Use the formal lessons learned approach but concentrate on the knowledge item rather than on a specific project.